1 Thing Most Golfers Get Wrong About Ball Striking: The Low Point Explained

Most weekend golfers I see at the range over by Lake Merritt in Oakland are obsessed with swing speed or the latest driver tech, completely missing what David Kuhn, a GOLF Top 100 Teacher, insists is the foundational flaw: they have no grasp of where the club’s low point actually occurs in relation to the ball. It’s not just a technical footnote; misunderstanding this single point is why so many solid contacts feel accidental and why improving iron play remains frustratingly elusive for so many players trying to shave strokes off their weekend round at the Metropolitan Golf Links.

Digging into why this concept evades so many recreational players reveals a deeper issue in how golf instruction has traditionally been consumed. For decades, the emphasis in popular media trickled down to focusing on positions – the top of the backswing, impact look-alikes – rather than the dynamic motion and physics governing the club’s journey through the arc. Kuhn’s point, echoed in recent GOLF.com instruction pieces, shifts focus to a measurable event: the lowest point the clubhead reaches during the downswing. For a proper iron shot, this low point needs to be just after the ball, meaning the club is still descending as it strikes, creating that ball-then-turf contact. Recreational golfers often flip their wrists early or hang back, causing the low point to occur behind the ball (hitting it fat) or, less commonly, well in front (thinning it). It’s a concept simple to state but hard to feel without proper feedback, which explains why drills focusing on clubhead path and low point awareness, like those recently highlighted by GOLF.com, are gaining traction among players seeking better consistency.

This isn’t just about individual frustration; it connects to broader trends in how golf is taught and played locally. Over the past five years, facilities like the Chabot Golf Course driving range have seen increased demand for technology-assisted lessons using launch monitors – tools from companies like TrackMan or FlightScope that provide objective data on club path, face angle and crucially, low point location. This data-driven approach helps bridge the gap between feel and reality for students struggling with Kuhn’s concept. The rise of indoor golf studios in areas like Temescal and Rockridge, such as those offering simulator-based coaching, allows players to practice the low point concept repeatedly in a controlled environment, independent of Berkeley’s infamous fog or the occasional Alameda crosswind messing with ball flight perception on the outdoor range.

Understanding this also has subtle socio-economic ripple effects within the local golf economy. As players grasp the low point concept and see tangible improvement in their iron play, their confidence grows, often leading to increased participation. This can mean more regulars at the weekday twilight leagues at Metropolitan, higher demand for quality used clubs at shops like Golfsmith in Emeryville (as players upgrade specific irons rather than whole sets), and potentially more greens fee revenue for public courses striving to retain players who might otherwise receive discouraged and quit. It’s a quiet reinforcement loop: better fundamental understanding leads to better play, which fosters greater engagement with the local golf ecosystem.

Given my background coaching competitive junior golfers through the Northern California PGA’s development programs and working with adult learners at public courses across the East Bay, if this low point concept is the missing piece in your ball-striking puzzle here in the Oakland-Berkeley corridor, here are three types of local professionals Consider seek out:

• Technology-Integrated Swing Coaches: Appear for instructors at facilities like Chabot Golf Course or Metropolitan Golf Links who explicitly use launch monitor data (TrackMan, FlightScope, or Foresight) as part of their lesson structure. The key criterion isn’t just owning the gear – it’s their ability to explain the low point numbers in simple terms and correlate them with specific drills or feels you can practice. Avoid those who just spit out numbers without connecting them to your swing mechanics and on-course results.
• Short Game & Contact Specialists: Seek out PGA Professionals whose primary focus and marketing emphasize iron play, wedge play, or developing consistent contact – often found giving clinics at local ranges or specializing in private lessons aimed at mid-to-high handicappers. Verify their approach includes tactile or visual feedback methods for low point awareness, like using impact tape, low-point sticks, or drawing lines in the turf, rather than relying solely on verbal instruction. Their effectiveness should be measurable in your improved ability to hit down-and-through iron shots consistently.
• Indoor Golf Studio Coaches with Data Focus: Instructors at studios in Temescal, Rockridge, or downtown Oakland that combine simulator play with structured lesson plans. The critical factor here is whether they use the simulator’s precise club data (not just ball flight) to diagnose and track improvements in your low point and clubhead path over a series of sessions. Look for coaches who assign specific, data-aware drills for you to practice between sessions, leveraging the studio’s consistency to build the motor pattern Kuhn describes.

Ready to uncover trusted professionals? Browse our complete directory of top-rated instruction experts in the Oakland area today.