Blockchain Tokens: Beyond Incentives – What’s the Point?

Standing on the shores of Lake Michigan, gazing at the Chicago skyline, it’s effortless to feel the pulse of innovation. But even here, in a city renowned for its financial markets and technological advancements, a fundamental question about the future of blockchain technology is brewing: do private blockchains *need* native tokens at all? A recent analysis by Columbia Business School professor Omid Malekan suggests they don’t, and the implications for everything from corporate supply chains to digital identity are significant.

The Core Argument: Permissionless vs. Permissioned Systems

Malekan’s work, highlighted in a recent post on X (formerly Twitter), draws a crucial distinction between permissionless and permissioned blockchains. Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana – the household names of the crypto world – are permissionless. Anyone can participate, and the native tokens (BTC, ETH, SOL) are essential for incentivizing the network’s security and operation. They create a system of property rights, as Malekan explains, that underpins the value of these real blockchains.

However, private, or permissioned, blockchains are different. These are typically used by organizations – think a consortium of banks or a large manufacturing company – to share data and streamline processes. Participation is restricted, and the central authority controls the network. According to Malekan, the incentive structures are fundamentally altered in this context. The need for a native token to secure the network diminishes, and with it, the inherent value proposition.

Why Native Tokens Struggle in Private Blockchains

The logic is straightforward. In a permissioned system, the participants are already known and trusted (to a degree). The central authority can enforce rules and punish bad actors. There’s less reliance on cryptographic incentives and more reliance on traditional legal contracts and reputation. A native token, in this scenario, becomes largely superfluous. It doesn’t solve a critical problem, and it doesn’t accrue value.

This isn’t to say that tokens are *never* used in private blockchains. They might be used for internal accounting or to represent specific assets. But these uses are different from the core function of a native token in a permissionless system – namely, to secure the network and incentivize participation. The Recent York Stock Exchange’s (NYSE) recent announcement of a tokenization plan, as noted by Malekan, has been met with skepticism, partly because of this very issue. Questions remain about the underlying utility of any token issued, and whether it’s simply a solution in search of a problem.

The Implications for Chicago’s Financial Sector

Chicago, as a major financial hub, is deeply invested in exploring blockchain technology. Institutions like the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME Group) are actively researching and implementing blockchain solutions for clearing and settlement. The Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago has too been involved in exploring central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). If Malekan’s analysis is correct, this means that many of the blockchain initiatives being pursued by these organizations may not require – or benefit from – a native token.

Consider a supply chain blockchain used by a network of food distributors in the Midwest. The goal is to track the origin and movement of goods, ensuring food safety and transparency. A native token might be used to reward participants for providing accurate data. However, a more effective approach might be to simply contractually obligate participants to provide accurate data, with penalties for non-compliance. The University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business has conducted extensive research on incentive structures in supply chains, and their findings suggest that well-designed contracts can be more effective than token-based incentives in many cases.

Beyond Finance: Digital Identity and Data Management

The implications extend beyond the financial sector. Consider digital identity solutions. Several companies are exploring blockchain-based systems for managing and verifying identities. Again, a native token might be used to incentivize users to maintain their profiles and share their data. But if the system is controlled by a trusted authority – such as the Illinois Secretary of State – the need for a token diminishes. The authority can simply require users to verify their identities through traditional means, and enforce penalties for providing false information.

Navigating the Future: A Local Resource Guide

Given my background in analyzing emerging technologies and their impact on financial systems, if this trend towards tokenless private blockchains impacts you or your business in the Chicago area, here are three types of local professionals you should consider consulting:

Blockchain Solution Architects

Seem for architects with a proven track record of designing and implementing *permissioned* blockchain solutions. They should be able to assess your specific needs and determine whether a native token is truly necessary. Focus on experience with Hyperledger Fabric, Corda, or similar enterprise blockchain platforms.

Smart Contract Auditors (Focused on Private Chains)

Even without a native token, smart contracts are often used in private blockchains to automate processes and enforce agreements. You’ll need an auditor who understands the unique security challenges of permissioned chains and can identify vulnerabilities in your smart contract code. Prioritize auditors with experience in formal verification techniques.

Data Privacy and Compliance Attorneys

Private blockchains still involve the collection and storage of sensitive data. You’ll need an attorney who understands the relevant data privacy regulations – such as the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA) – and can aid you ensure that your blockchain solution complies with all applicable laws. Look for attorneys with specific experience in blockchain and data privacy.

Ready to find trusted professionals? Browse our complete directory of top-rated blockchain experts in the Chicago area today.